Tweet
i think its better that someone who is way better than me who at best just followed tubbleweeds changes , The need to do the final review , understands exactly ALL the code within this include and do the management of release control , to a common area for deposit on a forham can be done , may not be this one cos the low limits on file attachments /downloads here
-
-
I agree with Mike.With that said, I encourage YOU to submit YOUR hard work to the community under YOUR own name. Be proud and stand tall!
As long as you've tested it and it seems ok, if something ends up needing correction then so be it.
I know I've posted enough stuff that wasn't right the first time, that's for sure!
Comment
-
ok guys
, i am not 100% sure its right ,
as,although it now compiles i have not loaded it on a chip and tested all the 6 ints it uses asl yet , will post it on UK PBP forham as v3.42 as listed some pages back
Cheers
SheldonComment
-
after finaly getting th 18f47q43 samples , i started doing testing on ther q43ints1-18 , my test to start with is timer0 high /low priority - high works / lowq hangs the chip , wondering if the fast save effects the low re- entry include as most would be saving / restoring incorrect registers ???Comment
-
In case anyone runs across this old thread, see https://support.melabs.com/forum/pic...d-q43-families
for a new and improved set of code.Comment
-
thanks again for your great work , i assume you let charles know about the EEPROM fix as well for the q43 libsComment
-
No, I completely forgot to mention that one. Thanks for reminding me.
It's part of the Q43 lib update I posted in https://support.melabs.com/forum/pic...amilies-movfflComment
Comment